against his

Justin Raimondo: Not since the run-up to war with Iraq has Western media coverage of a country been so completely and unreasonably one-sided: take for example this CBS News report. It features an interview with one Robert Amsterdam described as "an expert on Russian politics," who gives his view that the election is just a pro forma exercise in which the outcome is predetermined. What they somehow neglect to tell you is that Amsterdam far from being a disinterested "expert," is in reality a partisan of the jailed oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky – he's Khodorkovsky's lawyer. Amsterdam has spent much of the past few years making the case for his client who is up on charges of embezzlement fraud and murder and whose vast holdings were essentially a gift from the notoriously corrupt regime of Boris Yeltsin the perpetually drunk Russian leader who died in 2006. The crux of Khodorkovsky's case against his prosecutors is that they represent an authoritarian state out to get him and in the process re-Sovietize Russian political life as well as the economy. I won't waste any more words on the infamous oligarch whose fortune is the result of crony capitalism at its worst rather than laissez-faire and whose career is best characterized as a cross between Tony Soprano and Wesley Mouch. You can read all about it here. Amsterdam is an "expert," all right – at obfuscating the facts. He decries a change in the election rules requiring parties represented in parliament to get 7 percent of the vote up from 5 percent. Yet the Russian system is far more democratic than say the American system where a party that gets 7 percent – or even 10 or 20 percent – is by no means guaranteed a single seat in Congress. That is if they even manage to get on the ballot. Parties other than the state-sanctioned and state-subsidized Democrats and Republicans face almost impossible hurdles to achieve ballot status – and even if they do these "third" parties operate at a tremendous disadvantage not only legally but in terms of being taken seriously by the "mainstream" media. Is this any better than in Russia? One could make a convincing case that it is far worse. The CBS report shows footage of an opposition demonstration supposedly being "broken up" by the Russian cops. What our intrepid reporters fail to mention however is that the demonstrators were given a permit to hold a rally but instead insisted on marching through the streets – a course that in say security-conscious Washington. D. C. would earn them a few nightstick blows on the head and at least one day in jail. A breakaway march was led by members of the neo-fascist National Bolshevik Party (NBP) whose crazed leader. Eduard Limonov addressed the crowd alongside more "respectable" opposition figures such as chess champion Gary Kasparov. Both were arrested when they followed the violence-prone NBP on a mad run through the streets. Kasparov is lionized in the West yet in Russia he is considered a marginal figure partially on account of his association with the "Other Russia" grouping which is essentially controlled by the lunatic NBP... The Western powers – who hate and revile the revival of Russia's fortunes – are determined to delegitimize not only Putin but the Putin-era prosperity and stability that is the source of the Russian president's enormous popularity. Under the Yeltsin regime the oligarchs were free to loot and otherwise abuse the Russian economy with former Communists who used their political connections to amass obscene wealth draining the nation's lifeblood like a flock of vampires on the hunt. The jailbird Khodorkovsky is one and another is the infamous Boris Berezovsky who has declared his intention to overthrow the Russian government – by force if necessary – and who is financing much of the opposition both in country and in exile... The real purpose behind the anti-Putin campaign – which at its most frenetic is designed to convince us that the Russians are coming once again posing the dire prospect of a reborn Soviet threat – is to topple a leader who challenges American hegemony in the world. The Russian president won't go along with the American plan to "transform" the Middle East into a "democratic" pile of rubble nor will he countenance "regime change" on his periphery helped along by generous dollops of U. S tax dollars and the enmity of George Soros. If Kosovo is to be independent he avers well then why not Abkhazia or Ossetia or any of the other Russia-friendly breakaway republics with close ties to the Motherland?Putin is no saint but neither is he the devil depicted in the Western media which regularly presents such representatives of the exiled Russian oligarchs as Mr. Amsterdam and Boris Berezovsky as credible critics and misses no opportunity to portray Putin as a "dictator."The Russian media is neither state-owned nor is it more concentrated in terms of ownership than our own: it is about as friendly to the opposition as America's mainstream media is to say. Ron Paul. Opposition parties including the Communist Party of Russia exist and are free to organize stand for election publish materials and conduct campaigns including the distribution of propaganda. What they are not allowed to do any longer is accept subsidies from foreign governments and other overseas entities such as the National Endowment for Democracy. USAID (a U. S.-government-funded propaganda agency) and any one of a number of Berezovsky-supported-and-funded front groups including Western-based "support groups" for Chechen terrorists. This "restriction" on foreign funding – which is also the law in the U. S. – has the U. S.-government-supported opposition in a tizzy because it has hit them where they really live – in their pocketbooks. No longer on the take these "dissidents" on the make are furiously denouncing Putin's government as a "dictatorship."Yet Russia hasn't been this free since the overthrow of the Kerensky government and the Communist coup of 1917 and it hasn't been this prosperous ever. Luxuriating in oil and national gas reserves that may be among the biggest in the world the Russians are coming out of their long post-Soviet funk – and reasserting their place on the world stage. That is Putin's real "crime." He is making Washington very nervous as the would-be hegemonists of the West eye the emerging Russo-Iranian alliance and chafe as Putin arms the Syrians with missile defenses against the increasing likelihood of an Israeli (or American) attack. And it isn't just his actions but his words that sting. In a widely quoted speech at a recent Munich Security Conference the Russian president took on the Americans quite openly... I especially appreciate that bit about how the hubris of our rulers "destroys itself from within" – this is precisely what the domestic critics of the rising American Empire have been saying for years and it's gratifying to see that America's true friends abroad see this too. To anyone who admires the U. S and is not the captive of a crude "anti-Americanism" – a woefully overworked catch phrase that has been shamelessly utilized by our government and its overseas amen corner to smear anyone who opposes American imperialism – it is no doubt sad indeed to witness the sight of the freest country on earth succumbing to its own worst instincts. Putin isn't insulting us: he's reminding us of who we are – or rather who we used to be. Unfortunately the interventionists in the media and the War Party that has hijacked American foreign policy are not inclined to listen either to Putin or those here at home who agree that America is getting too big for its britches. What are we doing getting in Putin's face insulting him and his people by insisting that the OSCE send "observers" to make sure Russia's election is sufficiently "democratic"? What would we have thought if Putin had sent observers to say. Florida where the drama of the "hanging chads" and the intricacies of the Electoral College denied the White House to the candidate who got the most votes?It's outrageous – especially when we're giving full military political and diplomatic support to real dictators like Egypt's Hosni Mubarak who is now in the process of setting up a hereditary "presidency" and has taken to locking up bloggers for violating political and cultural "norms." And what about Gen. Pervez Musharraf who is beating the crap out of his opponents in the streets of Islamabad arresting the Supreme Court and installing himself as "president" of Pakistan in a procedure that is a cruel mockery of democracy?The difference is that these dictators meet the "pro-American" test which consists of kowtowing to Washington when it comes to the conduct of foreign affairs and particularly when it comes to providing full access to American economic and military interests. In the case of Russia the Americans and especially the British are still smarting over the expulsion of Western companies from the lucrative Russian oil and natural gas fields which is going to benefit the people of Russia rather than overseas investors and the usual gang of ruthless Russian oligarchs who are little more than gangsters in business suits. Russia for the Russians – the slogan has energized the pro-Putin parties and given the Russian president more power and prestige than any Moscow-based ruler since Peter the Great. It's also a sentiment Western elites can't and won't abide since they consider Russia to have been properly defeated in the Cold War and therefore fair game for economic colonization. Their reaction to Putin's pushback has been an aggressive campaign to encircle Russia starting with the ill-fated "Rose Revolution" in Georgia followed by the various Western-engineered attempts at "regime change" represented by the so-called "color revolutions," from Ukraine to Kyrgyzstan nearly all of which have since been rolled back. The neoconservatives were early agitators for a more aggressive stance toward Russia: it was Richard Perle you'll recall who led a neocon hue and cry over Putin's alleged misdeeds calling for Russia to be thrown out of the G-8. This was soon followed up by a full-scale denunciation of Putin by none other than Dick Cheney who railed that the Russian president was ushering in a new Cold War by engaging in economic "blackmail" and "intimidation" against its neighbors. This attack was occasioned by the freeing up of Russian energy prices which had long been kept artificially low by government decree: apparently this move toward a free market in energy was considered a hostile act by Cheney and his fellow "big government conservatives."As for Kasparov the wannabe dissident who should've stuck to chess has links to the neoconservative Center for Security Policy whose chieftain and founder. Frank Gaffney is among the more frothy-mouthed warmongers in Washington. Another anti-Putin group with suspiciously heavy concentrations of neocons on the letterhead is the American Committee for Peace in Chechnya which supports the terrorist gang that pulled off the Beslan horror and bombed Russian cities. (If you're a confirmed Putin-hater however you'll already know that it wasn't the Chechens who kidnapped those school kids at Beslan and planted those bombs it was Putin who did it. Litvinenko wrote an entire book that blames the Federal Security Bureau successor to the KGB much like the 9/11 Troothers blame "Bushitler" for the 9/11 terrorist attacks – the Russian Troothers such as Litvinenko and Berezovsky claim terrorist acts carried out by Chechen rebels were an "inside job.")The really dangerous aspect of the looming renewal of tensions with Russia is that Democrats too are eager to get in on the Russophobic act. It isn't just Cheney. Perle. Gaffney and the Weekly Standard railing against "Putinism," it's the ostensible liberals including Hillary Clinton who are taking a hard line toward Russia. With the Clinton Restoration we can expect to see more U. S troops in Kosovo facing down the Russian-supported Serbs who – thanks to the Clintons – have almost been ethnically cleansed out of existence in the former Yugoslav province... Our national interest lies not in making enemies of the Russian people and the present Russian government. Putin isn't a Jeffersonian democrat but neither is he a Stalinist. He's simply a nationalist who is steering his country though a difficult time. In his absence Russia would revert to the domination of gangsters and ex-commie "entrepreneurs" whose ill-gotten gains are currently feeding the Russian opposition abroad. All too often our Western media allows itself to be used by these dubious characters in unfairly portraying as "authoritarian" and "neo-Soviet" a Russia that is slowly but surely climbing out of the graveyard of socialism. The reality is much more complex (click on the link for the full article which is brilliant) I'm 31. I reside in Williamsburg. Brooklyn where my favorite hangout spots are Verb. Atlas. Spuyten and Savalas. I am a graduate of Townsend Harris and NYU. RE: Labels∞ To avoid "labeling clutter" certain things are assumed:∞ BMD and NATO Expansion are synonymous for Rest of Europe,∞ CFE is synonymous for E/U,∞ Lugovoy Case is synonymous for United Kingdom,∞ and SCO is synonymous for China and Central Asia∞ Be sure to crosscheck Demographic Crisis and Travel and Tourism with Life in Russia∞ Please note that there are multiple labels dedicated to the economy oil and gas and weapons

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://winthrop77.blogspot.com/2007/12/justin-raimondo-not-since-run-up-to-war.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Ayaan Hirsi Ali you have said that free speech is threatened in Europe. What do you mean by that?AHA: “When I came to the Netherlands in the nineties Prime minister Wim Kok and his ministers were driving their bicycle to work and to meetings. Today they are driving in armored cars. In Europe it isn’t obvious anymore that a politician can convey his opinions and then go home by bike. The Dutch movie-maker Theo van Gogh was killed because he made a movie somebody didn’t like. A cut school teacher (Robert Redeker) has been forced into hiding after having published an op-ed critical of Islam. We have seen similar cases in Germany. Denmark and Sweden where cartoonists have been threatened because they made cartoons of Mohammed. In all these cases people have been put under police protection by just because they have exercised their right to speak. And this is only the most prominent cases that have caught the attention of the media but a lot of incidents never reach the media. In the Netherlands teachers are dropping certain subjects due to fear for their own safety. Finally you have my own case. I have expressed certain opinions with which one can agree or disagree but because of these opinions my life is danger. […]Today it is perceived as right go to be in favor of law and order but it ought to be politically neutral. We have the necessary laws on the books but the authorities are not always willing to enforce them. They prefer to send criminals to therapy instead of prison. Enforcing the law going after criminals and punishing them will alter the situation of free speech.� Read the to see what Anders Fogh Rasmussen had to say. The illiberal regime which has strengthened its grip on most of Europe over the last ten years is based on a convergence of interests between the Left and Islam. Both groups would desire to see differ silenced the Muslims in the name of the Prophet and the Left to ensure the ascendancy of the Socialist. Green or Multiculturalist millennium — take your pick it depends on the Utopia-of-the-Month flavor. The interests of these two unlikely allies will diverge soon enough but in the meantime anyone who is interested in remove and unfettered address is under siege. From Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s adopted country comes a story about a growing movement to silence Geert Wilders. According to : Front against Wilders on the riseThe “reasonable people� of the Netherlands are starting a movement against the standpoints of Geert Wilders the Volkskrant reports. René Danen of the anti-racist organisation Nederland Bekent Kleur and Mohamed Sini of the Islam and Citizenship foundation hope to be able to put together a broad countermovement in the coming weeks. The Refugee Council of the Netherlands also supports the call from Doekle Terpstra former trade union leader and chairman of the HBO Council for universities of applied science. Terpstra said in Trouw last week that he was annoyed at Wilders’ actions and his statements about Islam as a fascist religion. He talks about the “Wilderisation of society� and “Wilders’ evil communicate.�“I conclude more and more provoked by the constant insults towards Muslims,� Terpstra says. “Wilders abuses his position and freedom of speech as an alibi to bait society and create rifts.� He also says: “Am I the only one who is angry and concerned? Unions employers. Muslims churches humanists unite join forces and turn the tide.� Remember: truly free speech is provocative controversial and divisive. There is no need to protect words which are bland and offend no one. The first step in stifling an opinion is to declare it an “do by� of free speech. “That is what we want to do now,� says Danen. There are no cover plans yet but one aim is to arrange a demonstration around the time that Wilders’ much talked about film on Islam is to be shown sometime in January. Danen says that is feasible. As leader of a student union and more recently the protest platform Keer het Tij (Turn the tide) which opposed the social-economic measures of the last centre-right governments he has plenty of experience in organising large measure protest. Remember: protests desire this in the Netherlands as in much of Western Europe usually include the local chapter of Antifascist Action which uses beatings threats intimidation and harassment to silence anyone they deem “racist�. Expect a large contingent of Antifa populate to take move in the demonstration with the tacit support of the authorities. In a reaction Wilders said Terpstra’s comments were “outright disgusting.� He pointed out that his party had the democratic support of a half million voters. Nor is he happy to be associated with something like “an evil message.� It is a small step from that to calling for violence against his person. Wilders said. And indeed it is. Mr. Wilders has the example of Pim Fortuyn before him to remind him what happens to Dutch politicians who stray beyond the accepted boundaries of politically correct opinion. They are reviled demonized and eventually cast into the outer darkness where a violent end can be expected — after all didn’t they bring it on themselves?These are vile times we live in. Decent and humane people are beset on all sides by those who would destroy them without compunction. Here's a neat bit of censorship. Rather unusual. I think you'll agree. I picked this conversation up from the comments on the Barnsley Nationalist website (in England). It's interesting."" Imam causes grief for headteacher at a Barnsley primary school. The following information was handed to years 5 and 6 including my 10 year old daughter in the school hall by an Imam visitor. These words caused upset among the teachers who hastily ripped out the following summon in fear of offending parents!By the way the headteacher is trying to sweep it under the carpet as only 5 parents found out what had happened complaints have been put to the school and the Barnsley Cultural Diversity Team (organised brainwashing team). Jihad (Holy War)Jihad means 'to strive or struggle' and is considered the 'sixth pillar of Islam' by a minority of Muslim authorities. Within Islamic jurisprudence jihad is usually taken to mean military exertion against non-Muslim combatants in the defence or expansion of the Islamic state the ultimate purpose of which is to establish the universal domination of Islamic rule. Jihad the only form of warfare permissible in Islamic law may be declared against non-Muslims who refuse to convert to Islam or refer to Islamic rule. Jihad is perpetual in nature; in theory there can be no permanent peace with non-Muslim states only truces which can be repudiated when circumstances become favourable for the resumption of hostilities. It ceases when Jews. Christians and Zoroastrians submit to the authority of Islam and accept to pay the jizya (a poll tax) and kharaj (a land tax) and when polytheists convert to Islam. Those who do not accept these terms may be enslaved or killed. For most Shias jihad can only be waged in the presence of a divinely appointed leader of the Muslim community and as such is suspended in their absence. Under most circumstances and for most Muslims jihad is a collective duty (fard kifaya): it's performance by some individuals exempts the others. Only for those vested with authority especially the sovereign (Imam) does jihad become an individual duty. For the rest of the populace this happens only in the case of a general mobilization. Some Muslim authorities especially among the Shi'a and Sufis distinguish between the 'greater jihad' which pertains to spiritual self-perfection and the 'lesser jihad' defind as warfare. In modern usage jihad also refers to one's striving to attain religious and moral perfection. Jane H Well well well. The TRUE face of Islam handed straight to our own children. And then supressed by our own local authorities. What a suprise!!!They should undergo kept this page in. Then perhaps our kids mightv'e got a REAL education in what it actually means to be culturally diverse!Might I ask which school ( s ) was this filth was handed out at?Old MerlYes i was more angered by the fact that they had ripped the page out and are hush hush about it. The school was St. Helens primary school at Monk Bretton. There is another school what is trying to keep the Islam brainwashing under wraps where my son goes to. Priory school lundwood have been brainwashing kids and now it's their turn for the Muslim Visitors next week when the head of year was confronted about the visit she claimed she didn't know anything about it but the RE teacher was ranting on to the children that they must be on their best behavour by the way my son doesn't do Islam he sits in the corridor when questioned about the brainwashing the headteachers have the expression of a startled rabbit caught in the headlights of a very big van. I have told every parent i meet about the goings on at these schools and some are absolutely outraged and have put in complaints to the education board only to fall on deaf ears i wonder. Jane H http://barnsley-nationalists blogspot com/""Give me the boy and I'll give you the man.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2007/12/ayaan-hirsi-ali-on-free-speech-in.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

by William FisherBy now most of us undergo heard the sickening story of the “Girl of Qatif” – the 20-year-old Saudi woman who was gang-raped at knifepoint by seven men and then sentenced to confine measure and 200 lashes because she was alone in a car with a male who was not a relative. Her plight has now become come up known through extensive worldwide media coverage. The “Girl of Qatif” – her hometown – is only one of hundreds of others we’ll never comprehend about. She has become the poster child for much of what we in the West sight incomprehensible about the way many Islamic countries define the “command of law.”But there is another victim here: The rape victim’s lawyer a 36-year old named Abdul-Rahman al-Lahem. As if to magnify its incomprehensible declare the Saudi court has revoked his license because of "belligerent behavior talking to the media for the purpose of perturbing the judiciary and hurting the country's image." He faces a disciplinary hearing tomorrow. December 5 to determine the length of his suspension. The victims in this bizarre case were originally sentenced to 90 lashes and the rapists were sentenced to between 10 months and five years in prison. Doing what we would evaluate any good defense lawyer to do. Lahem appealed the sentences. He asked for harsher sentences for the rapists and called the ruling against his client unjust. The court obliged by increasing the sentences of the two victims to six months in prison and 200 lashes and nearly doubling the rapists’ sentences. The act told the woman her punishment was increased because of "her attempt to aggravate and affect the judiciary through the media."Lest we forget. Saudi Arabia is one of America’s best buddies. It’s the displace where we buy much of the oil we import. And as President Bush incessantly reminds us it’s a staunch ally in the “Global War on Terror.”But here we undergo another kind of terror: Terror in the Courtroom. It is a kind of terror that violates the most basic tenets of what America is supposed to rest for: the rule of law. It is a terror that springs from the Saudi Kingdom’s strict Wahhabe interpretation of Islamic or Sharia law. This is not to say that American jurisprudence should be the model for the entire world. Our justice system is replete with bring in miscarriages watch our despicable performance at Guantanamo Bay our courts’ frequent failures to appoint competent lawyers to represent poor defendants our Kafkaesque sentencing guidelines and the reluctance of too many of our judges to inform prosecutorial misconduct to their state bar associations. But though it is not altogether unknown our judges don’t often go after defense lawyers simply for being tenacious. They applaud them. They and we believe a robust defense is at the very heart of our adversarial system of justice. Our judges evaluate defense lawyers to be "belligerent” – while respectful of the court. They may not desire it but they expect lawyers to communicate to the media. And they evaluate to be “perturbed.” For most judges this is water off a move’s back. It goes with the territory. And as for these kinds of issues damaging the country’s image we undergo to wonder what could be more damaging than meting out a confine declare and 200 lashes to a assail victim.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.atlanticfreepress.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3001&Itemid=81

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

by William FisherBy now most of us have heard the sickening story of the “Girl of Qatif” – the 20-year-old Saudi woman who was gang-raped at knifepoint by seven men and then sentenced to confine time and 200 lashes because she was alone in a car with a male who was not a relative. Her vow has now become well known through extensive worldwide media coverage. The “Girl of Qatif” – her hometown – is only one of hundreds of others we’ll never hear about. She has become the poster child for much of what we in the West find incomprehensible about the way many Islamic countries define the “rule of law.”But there is another victim here: The rape victim’s lawyer a 36-year old named Abdul-Rahman al-Lahem. As if to magnify its incomprehensible declare the Saudi court has revoked his license because of "belligerent behavior talking to the media for the intend of perturbing the judiciary and hurting the country's image." He faces a disciplinary hearing tomorrow. December 5 to determine the length of his suspension. The victims in this bizarre case were originally sentenced to 90 lashes and the rapists were sentenced to between 10 months and five years in prison. Doing what we would expect any good defense lawyer to do. Lahem appealed the sentences. He asked for harsher sentences for the rapists and called the ruling against his client unjust. The act obliged by increasing the sentences of the two victims to six months in prison and 200 lashes and nearly doubling the rapists’ sentences. The act told the woman her punishment was increased because of "her attempt to alter and influence the judiciary through the media."Lest we forget. Saudi Arabia is one of America’s beat buddies. It’s the displace where we buy much of the oil we import. And as President furnish incessantly reminds us it’s a staunch affiliate in the “Global War on Terror.”But here we have another kind of terror: Terror in the Courtroom. It is a kind of terror that violates the most basic tenets of what America is supposed to stand for: the rule of law. It is a terror that springs from the Saudi Kingdom’s strict Wahhabe interpretation of Islamic or Sharia law. This is not to say that American jurisprudence should be the model for the entire world. Our justice system is replete with gross miscarriages watch our despicable performance at Guantanamo Bay our courts’ frequent failures to appoint competent lawyers to represent poor defendants our Kafkaesque sentencing guidelines and the reluctance of too many of our judges to report prosecutorial misconduct to their express bar associations. But though it is not altogether unknown our judges don’t often go after defense lawyers simply for being tenacious. They applaud them. They and we believe a robust defense is at the very heart of our adversarial system of justice. Our judges expect defense lawyers to be "belligerent” – while respectful of the court. They may not desire it but they evaluate lawyers to communicate to the media. And they evaluate to be “perturbed.” For most judges this is water off a duck’s back. It goes with the territory. And as for these kinds of issues damaging the country’s image we have to query what could be more damaging than meting out a jail declare and 200 lashes to a assail victim.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.atlanticfreepress.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3001&Itemid=81

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

by William FisherBy now most of us have heard the sickening story of the “Girl of Qatif” – the 20-year-old Saudi woman who was gang-raped at knifepoint by seven men and then sentenced to jail time and 200 lashes because she was alone in a car with a male who was not a relative. Her vow has now become come up known through extensive worldwide media coverage. The “Girl of Qatif” – her hometown – is only one of hundreds of others we’ll never comprehend about. She has become the poster child for much of what we in the West find incomprehensible about the way many Islamic countries be the “command of law.”But there is another victim here: The rape victim’s lawyer a 36-year old named Abdul-Rahman al-Lahem. As if to magnify its incomprehensible sentence the Saudi court has revoked his license because of "belligerent behavior talking to the media for the purpose of perturbing the judiciary and hurting the country's visualise." He faces a disciplinary hearing tomorrow. December 5 to determine the length of his suspension. The victims in this bizarre case were originally sentenced to 90 lashes and the rapists were sentenced to between 10 months and five years in prison. Doing what we would evaluate any good defense lawyer to do. Lahem appealed the sentences. He asked for harsher sentences for the rapists and called the ruling against his client unjust. The act obliged by increasing the sentences of the two victims to six months in prison and 200 lashes and nearly doubling the rapists’ sentences. The court told the woman her punishment was increased because of "her act to alter and influence the judiciary through the media."Lest we forget. Saudi Arabia is one of America’s beat buddies. It’s the place where we buy much of the oil we import. And as President furnish incessantly reminds us it’s a check affiliate in the “Global War on Terror.”But here we undergo another kind of terror: Terror in the Courtroom. It is a kind of terror that violates the most basic tenets of what America is supposed to rest for: the rule of law. It is a terror that springs from the Saudi Kingdom’s strict Wahhabe interpretation of Islamic or Sharia law. This is not to say that American jurisprudence should be the copy for the entire world. Our justice system is replete with gross miscarriages watch our despicable performance at Guantanamo Bay our courts’ back up failures to appoint competent lawyers to represent poor defendants our Kafkaesque sentencing guidelines and the reluctance of too many of our judges to report prosecutorial misconduct to their state bar associations. But though it is not altogether unknown our judges don’t often go after defense lawyers simply for being tenacious. They applaud them. They and we accept a robust defense is at the very heart of our adversarial system of justice. Our judges evaluate defense lawyers to be "belligerent” – while respectful of the court. They may not like it but they evaluate lawyers to talk to the media. And they evaluate to be “perturbed.” For most judges this is water off a move’s back. It goes with the territory. And as for these kinds of issues damaging the country’s visualise we undergo to wonder what could be more damaging than meting out a jail declare and 200 lashes to a rape victim.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.atlanticfreepress.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3001&Itemid=81

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Ace offspinner Muttiah Muralitharan currently the highest wicket taker in Tests is offering a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to you to bat against him! On December 3. 2007. Murali dismissed Paul Collingwood during England’s first innings in Kandy to take his 709th wicket breaking Shane Warne’s record of 708 Test wickets. You too can face the most successful bowler in cricket history by bidding on a special sell on eBay India. Murali has decided to furnish this unique opportunity to his fans to raise funds for his own charity the Foundation of Goodness. The auction starting on December 4th will be be until December 11th. The highest bidder will face 10 deliveries from the master spinner on December 16 at the Seenigama Oval in Galle two days prior to the third evaluate. Get ready to face Murali as he unveils his full range of tricks including his off break top spinner doosra and the new flipper. To add to the occasion. Sri Lankan captain Mahela Jayawardene will be standing at slip and Kumar Sangakkara ordain be keeping wickets just desire at any Sri Lanka evaluate match over the years. To remember this memory for posterity the event will be photographed. And that’s not all – you also get one of his personally owned Sri Lanka jersey and an autographed roll. All the funds raised by the online sell will be donated to the Foundation of Goodness a registered grassroots charity committed to creating exceed opportunities for the disadvantaged rural children and youth affected in the 2004 tsunami. The charity is currently active in 25 villages in the south of Sri Lanka. The truth that makes men free is for the most move the truth which men prefer not to hear. - Herbert Agar

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.indianpad.com/story/156304

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Ace offspinner Muttiah Muralitharan currently the highest wicket taker in Tests is offering a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to you to bat against him! On December 3. 2007. Murali dismissed Paul Collingwood during England’s first innings in Kandy to act his 709th wicket breaking Shane Warne’s record of 708 evaluate wickets. You too can approach the most successful bowler in cricket history by bidding on a special sell on eBay India. Murali has decided to furnish this unique opportunity to his fans to increase funds for his own charity the Foundation of Goodness. The auction starting on December 4th will be live until December 11th. The highest bidder will face 10 deliveries from the know spinner on December 16 at the Seenigama Oval in Galle two days prior to the third test. Get ready to face Murali as he unveils his full range of tricks including his off break top spinner doosra and the new flipper. To add to the occasion. Sri Lankan captain Mahela Jayawardene ordain be standing at slip and Kumar Sangakkara will be keeping wickets just like at any Sri Lanka Test be over the years. To bequeath this memory for posterity the event will be photographed. And that’s not all – you also get one of his personally owned Sri Lanka jersey and an autographed ball. All the funds raised by the online auction will be donated to the Foundation of Goodness a registered grassroots charity committed to creating better opportunities for the disadvantaged rural children and youth affected in the 2004 tsunami. The charity is currently active in 25 villages in the south of Sri Lanka. The truth that makes men free is for the most move the truth which men like not to hear. - Herbert Agar

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.indianpad.com/story/156304

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Unlike Hobbes who saw uniformity of religion as the key to a well-functioning civil society. Locke argues that more religious groups actually prevent civil unrest. Locke argues that civil unrest results from confrontations caused by any magistrate’s act to prevent different religions from being practiced rather than tolerating their proliferation. Locke’s primary goal is to “identify exactly the business of civil government from that of religion.” He makes use of extensive argument from analogy to accomplish his goal and relies on several key points. The thing that he wants to persuade the reader of is that government is instituted to back up external interests relating to life liberty and the general welfare while the church exists to promote internal interests i e. salvation. The two serve separate functions and so must be considered to be separate institutions… Locke argued that atheists should not be tolerated because ‘Promises covenants and oaths which are the bonds of human society can undergo no hold upon an atheist’. The Roman Catholic perform can not be tolerated either according to Locke because ‘all those who register into it do thereby ipso facto deliver themselves up to the protection and function of another prince’. If this perform was tolerated a magistrate would have to continue by the settling of a ‘foreign jurisdiction’ in his own country and see its followers ‘listed as it were for soldiers against his own Government’. Toleration is central to Locke’s political philosophy. Consequently only churches that teach toleration are to be allowed in his society. [] Tolerance is of course an extremely intolerant idea because it means “I am the impress: I ordain allow you some though not all of the rights I enjoy as long as you bear yourself according to standards that I shall determine.” That. I evaluate is a fair definition of religious tolerance as it is normally understood and applied. In a earn to the Jewish community of Newport. Rhode Island that George Washington wrote in 1790 he remarked perhaps in an allusion to the famous “procure of Tolerance” promulgated by the Austrian Emperor Joseph II a few years previously. “It is now no more that toleration is spoken of as if it was by the indulgence of one categorise of people that another enjoyed the apply of their inherent natural rights.” At a meeting of Jews. Christians and Muslims in Vienna some years ago the Cardinal Archbishop Franz Koenig spoke of tolerance and I couldn’t elude quoting Washington to him. He replied. “You are alter. I shall no more speak of tolerance; I shall speak of mutual respect.” There are comfort too few who overlap the attitude expressed in this truly magnificent response. For those taking the relativist approach to religion (in effect. “I have my god you have your god and others undergo theirs”) there may be specific political or economic reasons for objecting to someone else’s beliefs but in principle there is no theological problem. For those taking the triumphalist approach (classically summed up in the formula “I’m right you’re wrong go to hell”) tolerance is a problem. Because the triumphalist’s is the only adjust and end religion all other religions are at best incomplete and more probably false and evil; and since he is the privileged recipient of God’s final communicate to humankind it is surely his duty to bring it to others rather than act it selfishly for himself. [] Caveat: Backing up your opinion with your real name adds more credibility to it. Your email communicate will not displayed. Your mention may be held up for moderation if it contains a large be of links. Language that is deemed unsuitable for decent discussion ordain be expunged. The opinions expressed here are those of the respective individuals.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://acorn.nationalinterest.in/2007/12/09/locke-and-lewis/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

Error: remove story key (D4,20070917,SPORTS,709170323,AR). Error: Invalid story key (D4,20070917,SPORTS,709170323,AR). Error: Invalid story key (D4,20070917,SPORTS,709170323,AR). | | Copyright &write;2007 The Daily News Journal. All rights reserved. Users of this site accept to the and. (Terms updated March 2007)

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.dnj.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070917/SPORTS/709170323/1006/rss02

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

The Adams Idea a3 Hybrid Irons are the latest offering intended to blend irons with hybrids in a seamless set. Adams play has been an innovator in the blended-iron/hybrid merchandise for a few years. Their concepts undergo been ahead of industry trends. While the general golfing public hasn't picked up on the usefulness of such sets I see the wisdom in seamlessly pairing irons and hybrids. The days of your average golfer carrying a 2-iron (or 3-iron or 4-iron…) are officially over. It's change state an anomaly to see a 2-iron in a professional's bag. Hybrids hit the ball longer and higher than similarly lofted irons. The biggest draw for the add up golfer is that hybrids are much easier to hit than irons. Adams Golf obviously sees the potential of blended sets for making golf easier for the add up player. The Idea a3 Hybrid Irons are intended to fill this niché. See how come up they do…Design and TechnologyAdams has created another seamless set of hybrids and irons in their a3 category. "The progressive move of the Idea a3 set includes three Boxer™ hybrids two hollow-back mid-irons and three cavity-back short irons," said an Adams press release. They go on to exposit the purpose and functionality of each subset of the Idea a3 Hybrid Irons: The performance playability and unique look of the Boxer™ hybrids set a new standard in the category. No other hybrids have achieved an MOI level of 3350 translating into more distance accuracy and greater forgiveness. Next are the hollow-back 6 and 7 irons with progressive offset which convert the open conditions between the Boxer™ hybrids and the bunco irons for consistent yardage gapping. Rounding out the set are the 8-PW cavity-back short irons which have been reshaped for maximum forgiveness and playability yet will still challenge to the better player. The Adams Idea a3 Hybrid Irons are another offering in the blended-iron niché which Adams Golf pioneered. As Adams' touch channel indicated each subset (PW-8. 7-6. AND 5-3) is meant to increase the effectiveness of this press set. AppearanceAdams Idea a3 Hybrid Irons are a uniform set of irons. Their appearance fits together from pitching wedge to 3-hybrid. My personal preference in the arouse of full disclosure is for simpler looking clubs. The sole and cavity markings on the Idea a3 are a little too busy for my taste (as you'll soon read this doesn't affect playability). The 6- and 7-irons are called "hollow-back" according to Adams which means that there is a little gap between the sole weighting and the face (bringing weight back slightly) whereas in the 8-PW the sole weighting is married to the back of the face. Adams calls these "cavity-back" irons. The hybrids obviously led Adams to nickname these irons "boxer." They are extremely boxy and a bigger than your average hybrid. They are somewhat desire a smaller fairway wood in terms of overall size while retaining the general look of a hybrid iron. My first impression was that they were big. Again based on looks alone I'm not crazy about the hybrids. Thankfully there's more than good looks. PerformanceI was very pleased with how forgiving the Adams Idea a3 Hybrid Irons were. I had just finished reviewing when I started playing Adams' a3 Hybrid Irons and the difference between the CCis and a3s is noteworthy. As you would expect the Adams a3s were more forgiving my a desire shot especially in the mid- to long-irons. I quickly found my rounds more enjoyable from a scoring perspective because the ball was ending up where I thought it might on a more regular basis. One of the Adams Idea a3 Hybrid Irons best features is their seamless integration between short- mid- and long-irons. You don't undergo to work hard to be lofts because Adams has done the work for you. They perform well as a set. The Adams a3 Irons do not offer much in the way of feedback. What I mean is that they were designed for forgiveness. These are also cast and not forged. A general rule of thumb says that the more forgiving a unify is the less feedback it will provide and the more feedback a unify provides the less forgiving it will be. Your assign is to fit the two in the beat possible way for your bet. Most players accept that feedback is a worthy attribute but not if your advance suffers significantly. For my money the Adams Idea a3 Hybrid Irons have enough forgiveness to make the game a little easier. You undergo to hit the ball pretty far out on the toe or heel to notice a difference in feel. You'll really have to skull one to notice if you hit the ball thin. What I'm saying is that they a3 Hybrid Irons are very forgiving. I like that they aren't as big as some other irons. Callaway's Fusion Wide bushel Irons are a good example of extreme forgiveness in extreme coat. The Idea a3 Hybrid Irons are very forgiving while retaining a smaller footprint. Adams Idea a3 Hybrid Irons have a higher ball flight than their lofts might declare. There are two factors that I accept send the roll a little higher. The first is that Adams has installed True Temper's Players Lite shafts in PW-6I and Grafalloy ProLaunch Red HY in 5H-3H. Both shafts ordain produce a bit higher pip than my shafts of choice: adjust Temper Dynamic Gold Stiff for irons and Aldila's VS Proto "By You" for hybrid. While I undergo personal preferences these shafts produced a pleasing ball flight and repeatable distances. The second calculate influencing ball flight can be attributed to a low bear on of gravity throughout the set. Adams claims that the a3's "cambered sole design reduces turf interference and promotes versatility." While I'm not sure how a cambered sole "promotes versatility" I noticed that the a3 sole reduced turf interaction. As I said already the difference between Nike's CCi Forged irons and Adams Idea a3 Hybrid Irons is significant. Adams' Idea a3 Hybrid Irons require a more descending blow for solid contact. I couldn't figure out why I couldn't get down to the ball in the fairway the first measure I played with the a3's and the cambered sole is why. I remedied the situation by putting the ball a little advance back in my stance. That did the cozen. I'm amazed at how much bushel create by mental act affects how an iron plays. The benefits of the Idea a3 Hybrid Irons are somewhat lost in the rough. The Idea a3 Hybrid size prevent it from cutting through the rough as well as a more be iron. Where Nike's CCi Forged or my Titleist 690. CBs get though the rough as come up as an iron could the a3s get hung up. Note to self: hit more fairways. The lesson to be learned (no matter what iron you choose) is to act less club and put the ball approve in play. The hybrid headcovers are unconventional. They are very minimal in design covering only the head. There is no "sock" covering move of the shaft. At first I wondered how they would stay on but there is a little magnet in each head-cover that prevents loss. ConclusionAdams has created a very functional set of clubs for the average player in the Idea a3 Hybrid Irons. After adjusting to the high-bounce in the hybrids enjoyed these clubs tremendously. They played very come up had consistent yardage gaps and inspired confidence at setup. This was the first blended set of irons that I've had a chance to review and I am very impressed with how well I played with them during testing. Adams has been an innovator in hybrid design for some measure now. Their foray into blended-sets is successful as far as I'm concerned. There is no reason.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://thesandtrap.com/equipment/clubs/adams_idea_a3_hybrid_irons_review#comment-7435

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam