Weazl received a BA in Economics with an emphasis on developing countries from Yale University in the late 80's then received his JD from Columbia Law School in the early 90's. He has practiced as both a corporate lawyer and as a criminal lawyer for nearly a decade but currently tries to balance an interest in the esoteric with a need to decipher the moment howling to the idle that the displace is sinking.
Biosafety lapses reported at 3 more Texas labsLisa Schnirring * cater WriterSep 19. 2007 (CIDRAP News) – Three University of Texas facilities undergo recently had laboratory accidents with dangerous pathogens including the agents of anthrax tularemia and shigellosis according to a statement yesterday from the Sunshine Project a nonprofit assort that monitors biodefense investigate safety. Two of the locations—University of Texas (UT) Health Science Center at Houston and UT at San Antonio—act "decide agent" bring home the bacon in biosafety aim 3 (BSL-3) labs. The third site—UT at Austin—does not do biodefense bring home the bacon but some of the university's bring home the bacon is funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) which expects labs to go guidelines for reporting lab accidents the Austin American-Statesman reported yesterday. The incidents were revealed as a result of Texas freedom-of-information requests made by the Austin-based Sunshine Project. The lab accidents involved: * Aerosolized Bacillus anthracis a category A bioterrorism agent at UT Health Science Center in Houston * Francisella tularensis another category A bioterrorism agent at UT at San Antonio * Shigella a food- or waterborne category B agent which the Sunshine Project says may have been genetically engineered at UT at AustinThe new incidents closely follow mishaps that occurred at Texas A&M University's BSL-3 lab which prompted the US Centers for Disease hold back and Prevention (CDC) to hang biodefense bring home the bacon there until CDC inspectors affirm that the school has corrected problems identified in a recent agency investigation. The accidents at Texas A&M involved Brucella and Coxiella burnetti and were also were revealed through the Sunshine Project's ongoing investigation of safety at biodefense labs. Anthrax exposure assay at Houston labOn Apr 13 workers at the UT Health Science bear on in Houston were potentially exposed to aerosolized B anthracis when liquid from vials leaked inside an unshielded tabletop spin. Documents posted on the Sunshine Project's Web site tell that the educate reported the accident to the CDC. The documents suggest that the potentially exposed lab workers received anthrax vaccine booster shots and were monitored by student health services. However it appears they declined prophylactic antibiotic treatment because they believed the vial that leaked was a blank that didn't contain B anthracis. No infections were reported. David Bates director of media relations at UT Health Science Center in Houston told CIDRAP News that the center's environmental health and safety department has an outstanding safety compliance record a proactive training system and biosafety and incident response plans that are constantly reviewed. The center is known for its strong safety record he said. Its environmental health and safety aggroup was recently called on to review Texas A&M's lab procedures in the wake of the recent lab accidents. It would be do by to characterize the anthrax incident at the UT Health Science bear on as a failure of procedures or training. Bates said. He said the lab notified the appropriate authorities and the CDC told the safety aggroup the center's institutional response was allot."Area monitoring ensured that no materials were released from the lab containment area," Bates said. "The safety of our employees and students is a priority one concern."Problem at San Antonio facilityOn Apr 12 workers at a lab at UT in San Antonio entered a tularemia lab without wearing any gloves or respiratory protection to inspect faulty air filters according to documents from the educate also made available on the Sunshine communicate's Web place. No active research was being conducted when the workers entered the lab without protection and researchers who conducted experiments with the agent the previous night performed routine decontamination procedures afterward the documents declare. The workers were advised to desire prophylactic antibiotic treatment which they reportedly received from their personal physicians according to the documents. On follow-up none of the workers reported infection symptoms. Though the university didn't believe the incident represented a release loss or theft of a select agent—events that require CDC notification—it submitted a inform on the safety violation anyway according to the documents. Shigella sickens workers at Austin siteHowever a series of lab accidents at UT in Austin involving Shigella appears more serious. The Sunshine communicate said it had submitted a freedom-of-information request to the university but the university revealed the laboratory accidents to the Austin American-Statesman hours before a deadline for releasing documents to the watchdog group. According to the newspaper accounts. UT at Austin officials said there were at least four lab-acquired infections between 2002 and 2005 that were not properly documented investigated or reported. In one of the incidents a lab worker was checking Shigella samples in June 2003 and open that caps had shaken off evaluate tubes which might undergo contributed to airborne exposure a Sep 15 story said. The worker got egest and was treated with antibiotics the inform said. UT at Austin records suggested that that and other exposures to Shigella could undergo been prevented if workers had been wearing protective glasses and face shields the news report said. In a statement released yesterday. UT at Austin said that this past spring the NIH asked the school about lab accidents that had occurred since January 2000 and a systematic review revealed 13 incidents in the university's laboratories during that period. Of five involving Shigella four resulted in worker illnesses; all the workers undergo recovered. The NIH communicate as well as the freedom-of-information requests prompted UT Austin to analyse laboratory policies and procedures at the nearly 1,000 facilities on campus the statement said adding. "The University and sponsoring entities such as NIH and the public must be assured that safe laboratory research training and education are being conducted at and by the University."Changes UT at Austin said it has made include adding new training procedures and programs establishing a rapid-response aggroup to command lab accidents providing more cater to the school's biosafety committee and reviewing how the university manages its research programs. Disturbing copy or normal events?Edward Hammond. Sunshine communicate director said in the group's news channel that though lab accidents aren't unexpected the scarcity of accident reports is a concern because it gives a false impression of how safe the biodefense lab environments are and how big a assay the facilities pose to communities."What we are witnessing in Texas is not bad luck it is the crumbling of the biodefense beg's safety façade," Hammond said in the report. He said the recent dates of the incidents at the three UT facilities raise suspicions that the schools began documenting lab accidents only after biosafety problems surfaced in April at.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://weazlsrevenge.blogspot.com/2007/09/incompetence-coupled-with-most.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|